News & Press Experts Partner
Evergreen Reference · Pacific Governance · Security Frameworks

What Is the Biketawa Declaration? The Pacific Security Framework Explained

Island Security Policy Institute · Honolulu, Hawaiʻi · Updated October 24, 2026 · Last reviewed October 24, 2026
ISPI Research Staff
Island Security Policy Institute, Honolulu · Editorial standards
Evergreen Reference
Short answer

The Biketawa Declaration is a Pacific Islands Forum agreement, adopted by Forum leaders in Kiribati in 2000, that sets out how members respond together to crises in the region while respecting non-interference in domestic affairs. Forum leaders have invoked it for RAMSI, the COVID-19 pandemic and, on May 8, 2026, the regional energy crisis (Forum Secretariat).

Biketawa Declaration: key dates
DateEventSource
2000Forum leaders adopt the Biketawa Declaration in Kiribatiforumsec.org
Aug 16, 2003Forum leaders welcome RAMSI and say the Biketawa Declaration enabled rapid support for Solomon Islandsforumsec.org
Sep 5, 2018Boe Declaration on Regional Security builds on Biketawa with an expanded concept of securityforumsec.org
2020Biketawa triggered for the COVID-19 pandemic responseforumsec.org
May 8, 2026Forum leaders invoke Biketawa for a coordinated response to the regional energy crisisforumsec.org
Key Definition

The Biketawa Declaration is the Pacific Islands Forum's collective security framework, adopted in Biketawa, Kiribati in October 2000. It establishes the principles and mechanisms for a Forum response to situations that constitute a serious threat to political stability in any member state. Forum leaders have used it to coordinate regional responses since 2003, including the Regional Assistance Mission to Solomon Islands (RAMSI), assistance to Nauru and Tonga, and a collective response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The 2018 Boe Declaration expanded the Forum's concept of security, and in May 2026 leaders invoked Biketawa again for the regional fuel crisis.

What the Biketawa Declaration does

The Biketawa Declaration empowers the Pacific Islands Forum to take collective action — including the deployment of assistance missions — in response to crises affecting member states. Its core principles include commitment to democracy, human rights, and rule of law; acknowledgment that good governance is fundamental to political stability; and recognition that regional cooperation is essential for security in a geographically dispersed island community.

The Declaration does not create a standing military force or a binding collective defense obligation. It creates a political and diplomatic framework for collective Forum response — enabling member states to request assistance, and the Forum to coordinate that assistance, without requiring individual bilateral arrangements with each responding nation. This collective framework is what distinguishes the Biketawa Declaration from the bilateral security agreements — with China, Australia, and others — that have proliferated across the Pacific since 2022.

When the Declaration has been used

Solomon Islands, 2003–2017. The best-known use is the Regional Assistance Mission to Solomon Islands (RAMSI), a multinational police and military mission requested by the Solomon Islands government to restore order after years of ethnic conflict. RAMSI ran from 2003 to 2017.

Nauru, 2004–2009. Pacific Regional Assistance to Nauru provided governance and financial-management support during a debt and institutional crisis.

Tonga, 2006. After the November 2006 riots in Nukuʻalofa, Tonga's government sought help from Australia and New Zealand under the Declaration's provisions. The two countries sent 110 soldiers and 44 police officers.

Fiji, 2009. The Declaration was the basis for the Forum's 2009 suspension of Fiji after it failed to hold elections following the 2006 coup. The suspension was lifted in 2014.

Nauru, 2019. Forum observers monitored Nauru's 2019 parliamentary election.

COVID-19, 2020. Forum leaders invoked the Declaration to respond collectively to the pandemic, and on April 7, 2020 foreign ministers set up the Pacific Humanitarian Pathway on COVID-19 to speed medical and humanitarian assistance between members. This was the Declaration's first use for a non-political crisis.

Regional fuel crisis, May 2026. The Forum announced in April 2026 that it planned to invoke the Declaration, and leaders formally invoked it on May 8, 2026 to coordinate a regional response to the energy crisis, as conflict in the Middle East disrupted fuel supply chains. Heads of the regional organisations (CROP) set up a taskforce on the Middle East crisis, and special sessions of the Forum Officials Committee and Forum Foreign Ministers were called to design the response mechanism. ISPI reads the crisis as a case of supply chain singularity, the condition in which one supply route failure produces simultaneous shortages across island nations that share the same shipping lanes.

Biketawa and the Boe Declaration (2018)

On 5 September 2018, Forum leaders meeting in Nauru adopted the Boe Declaration on Regional Security. It builds on Biketawa and sets out an expanded concept of security covering human security and humanitarian assistance, environmental and resource security, transnational crime and cybersecurity, and it names climate change as the single greatest threat to the livelihoods, security and wellbeing of Pacific peoples. Biketawa remains the mechanism for a collective Forum response; Boe widens the range of threats that response can address.

Why the 2026 invocation matters for island security policy

The May 2026 invocation applied the Declaration to an energy and supply emergency, building on the COVID-19 precedent and the expanded security concept in the Boe Declaration. Climate-driven supply disruptions, disease outbreaks that cut shipping capacity, and geopolitical disruptions to Pacific shipping lanes are the kinds of non-military threats the Forum has now shown it will address collectively.

The 2026 invocation also occurred in the context of China's expanding security engagement in the Pacific, Australia's rapid bilateral security agreement signing, and the July 6, 2026 Chinese submarine-launched ballistic missile test, which flew over several Pacific island states and came down near the border of Tuvalu's exclusive economic zone (ABC News). The Forum's ability to invoke collective security mechanisms for non-military threats is one of the governance tools available to Pacific island nations navigating great-power competition without being forced into exclusive bilateral dependency. For the most recent Forum decisions, see ISPI's analysis of the 55th Pacific Islands Forum Leaders Meeting in Palau.

SIDS Global Bridge

The Biketawa Declaration is the Pacific SIDS' primary multilateral collective security instrument. Caribbean SIDS have analogous frameworks through CARICOM's Regional Security System (RSS), which has been deployed for disaster response and security assistance across the Eastern Caribbean. Indian Ocean SIDS have less developed multilateral security frameworks, relying more heavily on bilateral arrangements with India, France, and the United States. The Samoa Pathway identifies strengthening multilateral security frameworks as a priority for all SIDS regions.

Related ISPI Research
Pacific Forum Security Coordinators Roundtable June 2026 →What Is the Pacific Islands Forum? →Supply Chain Singularity — ISPI's Framework →WP-06 — Supply Chain Security in Island Communities →Shelter Theory and Pacific Small States →Pacific Security Outlook Report 2026 — ISPI Assessment →
Primary Sources

Frequently Asked Questions

When was the Biketawa Declaration invoked?
Forum leaders have used the Biketawa Declaration several times: the Regional Assistance Mission to Solomon Islands (2003–2017), Pacific Regional Assistance to Nauru (2004–2009), help to Tonga after the 2006 riots, the 2009 suspension of Fiji, a 2019 Nauru election observation mission, the collective COVID-19 response from April 2020, and the regional fuel crisis, formally invoked on May 8, 2026.
What does it mean to invoke the Biketawa Declaration?
Invoking the Biketawa Declaration activates the Pacific Islands Forum's collective security response framework, enabling Forum members to coordinate assistance — diplomatic, logistical, or operational — to a member state or region facing a serious security threat. It does not create a binding military obligation but provides political authorization for coordinated Forum action.
Is the Biketawa Declaration the same as a defense treaty?
No. The Biketawa Declaration is a political and diplomatic collective security framework, not a binding mutual defense treaty. It enables coordination and response but does not obligate military assistance. The bilateral security agreements Australia has signed with Pacific nations — including Tuvalu, Nauru, PNG, Vanuatu, and Fiji — create more specific bilateral defense obligations that the Biketawa Declaration does not.
What is the difference between the Biketawa and Boe Declarations?
The Biketawa Declaration (2000) is the Forum's mechanism for a collective response to a crisis. The Boe Declaration on Regional Security, adopted in Nauru on 5 September 2018, builds on it with an expanded concept of security: human security and humanitarian assistance, environmental and resource security, transnational crime, and cybersecurity. It names climate change as the single greatest threat to the livelihoods, security and wellbeing of Pacific peoples.
← All ResearchISPI Research Library →

Further reading

Related research

PaperWP-10 — Democratic Resilience in Pacific Island Nations →AnalysisDeep-Sea Mining in the Pacific: The Security Questions Island Governments Face →AnalysisChina Fired a Nuclear-Capable Missile Near Tuvalu on July 6. What It Means for Every Pacific Island Community. →AnalysisAustralia-Vanuatu Nakamal Agreement Signals Accelerating Pacific Security Architecture — What It Means for Island Governance →AnalysisSolomon Islands Proposes a Pacific-Wide Security Treaty. PIF Leaders Meet in Palau August 30. What the Panel Must Resolve. →PaperWP-01 — Island-State Security: Why Mainstream Frameworks Fail Pacific and Coastal Communities →GuidePacific Island Governance, Global Policy & AI: Research and FAQ →
Island Security Brief

New ISPI research and analysis on island public safety, by email.

Sent via Buttondown; you will get a confirmation email. Unsubscribe anytime. See our privacy policy.